Vanguard FTSE Global All-Cap reaches $1 billion in two weeks! Two ways to stress test spending from your portfolio.
September 4, 2026
Raph & Francesca
⭐ Featured
Banker on Wheels Resources
Vanguard FTSE Global All-Cap UCITS ETF At 0.07% Grows To $1 Billion In Just A Couple of Weeks
Banker on Wheels
VALL/VGLA ETF Assets under management jump to $1 billion since launch - an incredible achievement for an ETF which started trading only 2 weeks ago. For context, that is money arriving faster than Vanguard's own flagship VWCE gathered in its first entire year, and it has happened with no marketing push beyond the number that matters: the whole investable world, 10,000+ stock index, small caps included, for 0.07%. Europe's investors have already voted with their savings plans, and the verdict seems unambiguous.
So you have read our comprehensive review of Interactive Brokers (affectionately abbreviated IBKR or even IB by its users) and you have decided to open an account. This guide will walk you through the steps of the process. In some ways, this broker account opening process can be longer than for other brokers. That’s because IBKR is more sophisticated. But, we make this process a bit simpler. In the end going through it is worth the hassle given the benefits the broker may give you in the long run. Let’s get started!
Show more
📊 Portfolio Construction
Asset Allocation
The Withdrawal Clock: How Retirement Length Changes Spending
Morningstar
This article examines how the safe withdrawal rate changes dramatically with retirement time horizon. Using Morningstar’s forward-looking assumptions and Monte Carlo simulations, it estimates that a 40% equity/60% fixed-income portfolio can support a 3.9% starting withdrawal rate over 30 years, but about 4.4% over 25 years and 9.7% over 10 years, assuming a 90% probability of success. The piece also shows how retirees can use these figures to adjust spending during retirement. Someone withdrawing too much may need to reduce spending or give up inflation adjustments, while someone whose portfolio has grown strongly may actually be able to increase spending or use the surplus for gifts and one-off expenses.
Vanguard Global All-Cap ETF jumps to €180m in AUM (updated with Distributing and Accumulating Share Classes) & Women and Wealth
August 28, 2026
Raph & Francesca
Expertise is great, but it has a bad side effect. It tends to create an inability to accept new ideas.
Dean Williams
⭐ Featured
Banker on Wheels Resources
Your Battle Plan For The Next Market Chaos: Crafting a Rock-Solid IPS in 2026
Banker on Wheels
History shows that reacting emotionally to market turmoil is rarely the right move. Panic selling, driven by loss aversion and herd mentality, often leads to locking in losses and missing out on eventual recoveries. The urge to avoid further losses can be so strong that it overrides long-term investment plans, causing investors to make decisions they later regret.
Enter the IPS: not just paperwork, but your battle plan
Enter the Investment Policy Statement (IPS): not just paperwork, but your battle plan. It defines your goals, pins down your risk tolerance, and hands you clear rules for stormy markets—no matter how “unprecedented” they may feel. By acknowledging that market downturns and periods of uncertainty are inevitable, an IPS helps investors prepare emotionally and financially for the rough patches. By staying focused on long-term objectives and maintaining a diversified portfolio, investors can weather the storms of uncertainty and emerge stronger on the other side.
Ready to build your IPS? Here’s what to consider—and how often to revisit it. Let’s jump in.
So you have read our comprehensive review of Interactive Brokers (affectionately abbreviated IBKR or even IB by its users) and you have decided to open an account. This guide will walk you through the steps of the process. In some ways, this broker account opening process can be longer than for other brokers. That’s because IBKR is more sophisticated. But, we make this process a bit simpler. In the end going through it is worth the hassle given the benefits the broker may give you in the long run. Let’s get started!
Show more
📊 Portfolio Construction
Asset Allocation
60/40: Why Higher Correlation Doesn’t Mean Less Diversification
Morningstar
If bonds no longer reliably zig when stocks zag, perhaps the traditional balanced portfolio no longer works.
But that conclusion rests on a simplistic reading of a single statistic. Correlation describes whether two assets tend to move in the same direction, but it says nothing about the size of those moves or whether they help or hurt investors. Stocks and bonds can be positively correlated because they are both rising (good news) or because they are both falling (bad news).
The 60/40 portfolio was never designed around the idea that bonds would offset every stock market decline. Its purpose is to combine two assets with different risk characteristics to create a smoother investment experience. The objective of diversification isn’t to avoid periodic losses. Those are an unavoidable part of investing. The real goal is to reduce the severity of those short-term losses so investors can remain committed to their long-term plan through difficult markets.
Vanguard FTSE Global All-Cap Starts Trading, The Price of Not Investing & Cost to Retire Around the World
August 21, 2026
Raph & Francesca
Wealth consists not in having great possessions, but in having few wants.
Epictetus
⭐ Featured
Banker on Wheels Resources
Vanguard FTSE Global All-Cap UCITS ETF At 0.07% Starts Trading On XETRA and LSE
Banker on Wheels
Today, Vanguard has launched the FTSE Global All-Cap UCITS ETF (VGLA) on multiple European Exchanges. It’s the cheapest single-ticket exposure to the entire global equity market, with large, mid and small caps across developed and emerging markets, at a total expense ratio of just 0.07%.
The ETF began trading today (20 August) on Deutsche Börse’s Xetra and LSE, with parallel listings on Borsa Italiana, Euronext Amsterdam and the SIX Swiss Exchange.
It is the ETF equivalent the US-listed VT – Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund ETF (0.06% TER) and the Vanguard FTSE Global All Cap Index Fund long popular with UK investors, but still with 0.23% fee.
It’s the first time Vanguard has offered whole-market coverage, small caps included, in a European ETF without an ESG screen. For the first time, the fee is very close to US-listed ETFs, as well.
So you have read our comprehensive review of Saxo Bank and you have decided to open an account. This guide will walk you through the steps of the process.
In some ways, this broker account opening process can be a bit longer. That’s because SAXO is more sophisticated. But, we make this process a bit simpler. In the end going through it is worth the hassle given the benefits the broker may give you in the long run. Let’s get started.
Vanguard FTSE Global All-Cap UCITS ETF At 0.07% Grows To $1 Billion In Just A Couple of Weeks
europe finally gets THE GLOBAL market in one cheap etf
Vanguard has launched the FTSE Global All-Cap UCITS ETF (VGLA / VALL) on multiple European Exchanges. It’s the cheapest single-ticket exposure to the entire global equity market, with large, mid and small caps across developed and emerging markets, at a total expense ratio of just 0.07%.
The ETF began trading on 20th of August on Deutsche Börse’s Xetra and LSE, with parallel listings on Borsa Italiana, Euronext Amsterdam and the SIX Swiss Exchange.
It is the ETF equivalent of US-listed VT – Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund (0.06% TER) and the Vanguard FTSE Global All Cap Index Fund long popular with UK investors, but still with 0.23% fee.
It’s the first time Vanguard has offered whole-market coverage, small caps included, in a European ETF without an ESG screen. For the first time, the fee is very close to US-listed ETFs, as well.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Vanguard’s new FTSE Global All-Cap UCITS ETF started trading on Xetra, Borsa Italiana, the London Stock Exchange, Euronext Amsterdam and SIX.
At a 0.07% TER it is the cheapest broad global equity ETF in Europe – half the price of Vanguard’s own FTSE All-World (VWCE, 0.14%) and less than a third of its ESG Global All Cap (V3AM, 0.24%). It matches the 0.07% of the cheapest large/mid-cap all-country ETF (Amundi Prime All Country World, WEBN) while adding small caps, and undercuts the next all-cap fund (SPDR MSCI ACWI IMI, 0.17%) by ten basis points.
It tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index: roughly 10,000 large-, mid- and small-cap stocks across developed and emerging markets – around 98–99% of the world’s investable market capitalisation.
Both share classes went live together on 20 August: Accumulating (IE000VAHT5T0) and Distributing (IE000CVUM3N6, quarterly payouts). A currency-hedged class at 0.10% is provided for in the prospectus but has not been listed.
Update as of 4th September 2026: The ETF proves extremely popular. VALL/VGLA ETF Assets under management jump to $1 billion since launch.
VGLA starts trading on five exchanges
replicating an index with roughly 10,000 stocks
VGLA physically replicates the FTSE Global All Cap Index, a market-cap-weighted benchmark of roughly 10,000 stocks across developed and emerging markets and capturing approximately 98–99% of the world’s investable market capitalisation. The addition of small caps is what separates it from the FTSE All-World range, which stops at large and mid caps and covers around 90% of the investable universe.
Key Information
Field
Detail
Fund name
Vanguard FTSE Global All-Cap UCITS ETF (USD)
ISIN
IE000VAHT5T0 (Accumulating) and IE000CVUM3N6 (Distributing)
TER
0.07%
Index
FTSE Global All Cap Index (net total return, USD)
Index coverage
~10,000 large-, mid- and small-cap stocks, developed + emerging markets (~98–99% of investable market cap)
Replication
Physical (optimised sampling)
Use of income
Accumulating and Distributing Share Classes
Domicile
Ireland (UCITS)
Base currency
USD
Share class inception
18 August 2026
First trading day
20 August 2026
Where it trades
The ETF listed simultaneously on five venues.
The accumulating share class (IE000VAHT5T0)
Note the ticker differs on Xetra (VGLA) versus everywhere else (VALL, plus a USD line VALU in London).
Exchange
Ticker
Trading currency
SEDOL
Xetra (Deutsche Börse)
VGLA
EUR
BW9L7S4
Borsa Italiana (Milan)
VALL
EUR
BW9L7W8
London Stock Exchange
VALL
GBP
BW9N973
London Stock Exchange
VALU (VALL on IBKR)
USD
BW9N906
Euronext Amsterdam
VALL
EUR
BW9L7Y0
SIX Swiss Exchange
VALL
USD
BW9MHM1
The distributing share class (IE000CVUM3N6, quarterly distributions)
The distributing share class is not listed in Milan yet.
Exchange
Ticker
Trading currency
SEDOL
Xetra (Deutsche Börse)
VGLD
EUR
BW9MJ25
London Stock Exchange
VACD
USD
BW9N928
Euronext Amsterdam
VALLD
EUR
BW9MJ70
SIX Swiss Exchange
VALLD
USD
BW9MJ81
21st August 2026 Update: IBKR has the accumulating class under VALL for both the USD and GBP Share Classes.
Vanguard’s global range: before and after
until today, it was mainly vwce plus an esg etf
Until this morning, Vanguard’s global equity ETF shelf in Europe was essentially one product: the FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWCE) – the ‘VWCE & Chill’ cultural phenomenon we dissected in our deep dive into Vanguard’s European ETF business. Alongside it sat only the ESG Global All Cap UCITS ETF (V3AM), launched in March 2021 at 0.24%, which does include small caps but applies exclusionary ESG screens to the index.
VWCE was kept competitive through two fee cuts in quick succession: from 0.22% to 0.19% effective 7 October 2025 , then from 0.19% to 0.14% in July 2026.
Those cuts came against a backdrop of dependence: our analysis estimated that VWCE alone generated roughly 38% of Vanguard’s Irish UCITS ETF revenue, which long made deep cuts on the flagship economically unattractive – and helps explain why launching an entirely new, broader fund at 0.07% is a bigger statement than any fee cut on VWCE could have been.
VGLA changes the shape of the line-up: broader coverage than either existing fund, no screens, and a fee half of VWCE’s freshly-cut 0.14% and less than a third of V3AM’s 0.24%.
Vanguard ETF
Launched
Index
Coverage
Small caps
TER
FTSE Global All-Cap (VGLA)
20 Aug 2026
FTSE Global All Cap
~10,000 stocks, ~98–99% of investable market cap
Yes
0.07%
FTSE All-World (VWCE)
2019 (range since 2012)
FTSE All-World
~3,600 stocks, ~90% of investable market cap (large + mid caps)
No
0.14% (0.22% → 0.19% Oct 2025 → 0.14% Jul 2026)
ESG Global All Cap (V3AM)
Mar 2021
FTSE Global All Cap Choice
All-cap, ESG screens exclude part of the parent index
Yes (ESG-screened)
0.24% (unchanged since launch)
VGLA did not arrive alone. Vanguard listed it the same day as two siblings: a FTSE Global Small-Cap UCITS ETF (0.22%, accumulating – IE0007TPRF31, distributing – IE000F8RXD33) and a FTSE All-World ex-US UCITS ETF (0.12%, accumulating – IE0009A5ADV9, distributing – IE000G1H7OC0) — a three-fund set that lets investors hold the whole market in one line, or build it in modules.
What it means for investors
one ETf, unless you filter out small growth stocks
For anyone building a one-fund portfolio, VGLA is now the simplest answer: the entire investable world, small caps included, in a single ETF at 0.07%, without ESG screens (which we dislike, even though Vanguard is less problematic than competitors).
Unless explicitely investing in small cap value stocks and filtering out small growth equities, investors who have used a two-fund combination of a global equity ETF plus a blend small-cap satellite can collapse that into one holding – at a lower blended cost.
Both share classes were available from day one — the distributing line (IE000CVUM3N6) began trading on 20 August alongside the accumulating one. Vanguard’s prospectus documentation also provides for a currency-hedged variant at a 0.10% ongoing charge, according to reporting on the filing.
Should you switch? Existing VWCE holders shouldn’t rush to sell. Switching can trigger taxes and trading costs that dwarf a few basis points of fees, and the new fund still has to demonstrate tracking. But for new money, the default choice for global equity exposure just got cheaper and broader at the same time.
We will be releasing an updated Global Equity ETF ranking across all providers in the coming weeks, including how VGLA stacks up against the competition on cost, coverage and tracking, and including the recent fee drop on VWCE.
You can read our Q1 2026 Global Equity ETF Ranking here.
Thank you for reading. Good Luck and Keep’em* Rolling!
Avantis expands Small Cap Value ETF Availability, Return Stacked ETFs vs DBMF & 4 Alternative Paths to Retirement
August 14, 2026
Raph & Francesca
If you live in harmony with nature you will never be poor; if you live according what others think, you will never be rich.
Seneca
⭐ Featured
Banker on Wheels Resources
Equity Allocation: Is Your Overconfidence In Understanding Risk Leading You To Financial Ruin?
Banker on Wheels
Investing comes with various risks. One of the most critical is not achieving your goals. To reduce it, a certain amount of equity risk is needed.
On the flipside, some investors take more risks that they are able, willing or need to take. The excessive risk often comes from overconfidence in an “ability” to estimate the odds of the equity market.
In today’s article, Larry argues that being on the conservative side and thinking of equities as ‘uncertain’ is more prudent. More than the specific terms of the framework, focus on Larry’s key takeaway – for a lot of investors the perception of the equity market often flips from measurable ‘Risk’ to ‘Uncertainty’ we cannot measure when unprecedented events unfold.
Misjudging how our brain works when faced with black swans increases your risk of ruin.
So you have read our comprehensive review of Interactive Brokers (affectionately abbreviated IBKR or even IB by its users) and you have decided to open an account. This guide will walk you through the steps of the process. In some ways, this broker account opening process can be longer than for other brokers. That’s because IBKR is more sophisticated. But, we make this process a bit simpler. In the end going through it is worth the hassle given the benefits the broker may give you in the long run. Let’s get started!
Show more
📊 Portfolio Construction
Asset Allocation
Portfolio Protection: Another Look at different protections
CAIA Association
Risk mitigation strategies can be separated into three distinct categories: First Responders, Second Responders, and Diversifiers.
First Responders are the portfolio’s fast-twitch muscles. Their job is to respond immediately when markets become disorderly. Long volatility strategies sit in this category. They are designed to provide explicit and reliable protection during sudden market declines, even if that protection comes at the cost of carrying them during quieter periods.
Second Responders are the portfolio’s slow-twitch muscles and are intended to complement the First Responders. Rather than reacting to sudden panic, they seek to identify and exploit persistent trends as they emerge. Trend-following strategies are often less effective in the opening stages of a crisis but become increasingly valuable as market dislocations deepen and trends become established.
Diversifiers are capital-efficient, liquid alpha strategies whose job is to lift the average return of a risk mitigation program without importing short volatility or negative skew into a portfolio that benefits from the opposite. They matter for the longevity of a program, but they are deliberately optional and not explicitly defensive.
Banker, Cyclist or Retriever? Choose your investing style!
We have divided our guides into easily digestible chunks to make your journey more enjoyable.
Author: Raph Antoine · Last updated: June 16, 2025
Key Takeaways
Three Characters – We’ve designed three distinct characters to guide you through your investment journey. Choose the one that aligns with your investment goals, the amount of time you’re willing to dedicate to managing your portfolio, and your eagerness to deepen your understanding of financial markets.
Three Main Sections – Our content is organized into three primary sections to cater to different levels of expertise and interest: A beginner’s guide for those new to investing. An in-depth look at ETF selection and best practices, tailored for informed decision-making, and a section dedicated to investment strategies.
For Investors From All Around The World – Our resources, including the beginner’s guide and investment strategies, are designed to be universally applicable, benefiting investors worldwide. The ETF section is an exception. It caters to non-US investors by focusing on UCITS ETFs, which offer tax advantages for these investors.
How Do I See If An Article Is for me?
Look at the TOP left corner of our articles
Resource Guidance on the website
This image shows that this guide is Golden Retrievers given the icon in the top-left corner. It tells you the article is aimed at passive investors. The minimum knowledge level to understand it is “Beginners”.
Each character icon signals the difficulty and investing style of the resource, and the minimum knowledge level to understand it.
Each resource on this website is tagged according to the path you want to choose. The Icon reflects your Investing Style. From Simple Passive Portfolios (Golden Retrievers), through semi-passive (Cyclists) to Advanced Investing (Bankers).
The Golden Retriever, The Cyclist and The Banker!
We have created three characters to help you on your investing journey. Pick one of them depending on your objectives, time you want to spend managing your portfolio and willingness to increase your knowledge about financial markets.
The Golden Retriever
The Golden Retriever, aka Wise Passive Investor – has the simplest and easiest to understand portfolio with minimum maintenance, as he assumes – probably correctly – that a dog is just as likely to beat the market in the long run as a professional investor. The Golden Retriever follows the bone (aka money) in the most fee-efficient and transparent way. Simplicity often wins.
The Cyclist
The Cyclist, aka Semi-Passive DIY Investor – Accepts that markets are mostly efficient, but given her experience in travelling across the globe, she has the desire to incorporate a couple of active bets, and high-level tweaks (e.g. optimising taxes or offsetting job risks) to her predominately index portfolio. She also won’t bother overdoing this because, after accounting for costs and time doing research, trying to beat the market can’t compete with real life experiences like cycling the world.
The Banker
The Banker, aka Evidence-Based Investor – Has a good grasp of the markets, and wants to squeeze out all the returns based on academic research, for example using Factor Investing or Risk Parity Strategies. But, Equity Risk Factors underperform over long periods of time, and sticking to his guns will be challenging. Strategies with leverage also have their own risks. Implementation is not straightforward, and outcome – far from guaranteed.
What Does It Take To Be One Of Them?
Initial setup varies from a few weeks to a few months
You can become a Golden Retriever in just a few weeks. Your portfolio will be almost on autopilot. Customising your portfolio as a cyclists can take a bit longer, and maintenance is usually simple. To become a Banker, you need to acquire some portfolio management knowledge.
Not necessarily. But it’s easier to manage and understand.
The big misconception in investing is that a complex and sophisticated portfolio guarantees superior performance, as compared to a simpler one. Risks and Returns don’t necessarily depend on the complexity of your portfolio or your knowledge. The portfolio risk, whether it’s as straightforward as a Golden Retriever’s or as intricate as a Banker’s, varies based on how it’s built and the way assets are allocated.
To choose a portfolio, consider the following: Will you fulfil your life objectives with this portfolio? And crucially, will you remain level-headed and avoid rash decisions when (not if) its performance inevitably derails?
Are Retrievers Less Knowledgeable?
Sometimes they may be the smartest.
We divide our guides based on the desired complexity of your portfolio and willingness to learn more. So, if you see:
Golden RetrieverPassive Investing
It suits two types of audiences. First, Individuals who aim to learn just enough to maintain an efficient portfolio, allowing them to focus on other important aspects of life. Second, it may also be ideal for those who value knowledge but prefer to keep their investing strategy straightforward. That’s because a lot of smart Golden Retrievers are aware of investment pitfalls, including behavioural, tax and cost implications of active investing.
CyclistSemi-Passive DIY
Seeks customization in her investment approach, akin to a cyclist making precise adjustments for optimal performance. It’s particularly beneficial for those looking to enhance tax efficiency or balance specific risks, including perhaps job-related uncertainties (human capital).
BankerEvidence-Based
Has sophisticated investment needs. You must be comfortable navigating complex financial landscapes and looking for advanced portfolio strategies.
Which Investor Are You?
How To choose a character
Golden Retrievers comprise approximately one-third of readers who prefer simplicity, utilizing just 1–2 ETFs for their entire portfolio strategy.
Cyclists represent the largest segment at 58% of the audience. These readers maintain primarily passive approaches while experimenting with portfolio customization, including tax optimization and selective active positions.
Here are some of the practicalities of being a Golden Retriever:
Chewy — The Golden RetrieverPassive Investing
For whomAll Investors can set up this type of portfolio, including very beginners.
Why To Be A DogInvesting requires minimal effort. You can live your life to the fullest without spending time managing your portfolio, but still following best market practices.
Initial Time RequiredYou will need 4–8 weeks to become familiar with the materials to set up a portfolio and implement it.
Ongoing Portfolio MaintenanceYou only need a day or two per year to rebalance a portfolio.
Main ChallengesSticking to your strategy can be challenging during market crashes, and when certain markets that your friends are invested in outperform.
Number of ETFsYou won’t need more than a couple of ETFs.
Examples of FundsGlobal Equity ETFs or with the addition of bonds Vanguard Lifestrategy ETFs
Bankeronwheels.com ResourcesA significant part of our guides are targeting Golden Retrievers.
2. The Cyclist
Should You be Kumiko (組子) - The Cyclist?
Here are some implications of being a Cyclist:
Kumiko — The CyclistSemi-Passive DIY
For whomIntermediate or Advanced Investors.
TypeIndex portfolio with some active bets.
Why to be a CyclistAllows to (i) Invest in a customised way, improving tax efficiencies, potentially reducing fees, implementing some personal views for example related to sustainability, offsetting human capital and potentially increase risk-adjusted returns.
Initial Time RequiredYou will need 2–3 months to become familiar with the materials to set up a portfolio and implement it.
Ongoing Portfolio MaintenanceYou will likely need a day or two per quarter to rebalance a portfolio and optimise it from a tax perspective.
Main ChallengesMay require more research and maintenance. You will be prone to potential behavioural biases, and may find it challenging keeping the active part relatively small and a consistent over time.
Number of ETFsUsually involves at least three funds.
Examples of FundsRegional tilts to capitalization-weighted indices, adding diversifiers, Socially-responsible Screening or Tax-efficient regional ETFs.
TypeInvesting incorporating Equity Risk Factors or Strategies like Risk Parity.
Why To Be a BankerAllows for potential outperformance compared to capitalisation-weighted indices.
Initial Time RequiredYou will need at least months to become familiar with academic research related to risk factors, and implement it.
Ongoing Portfolio MaintenanceYou will likely need a day or two per quarter to rebalance a portfolio and optimise it from a tax perspective.
Main ChallengesSubstantial research, maintenance and adequate ETF selection. Potential behavioural biases, keeping the active, underperforming parts consistent over long periods of time. Poor UCITS availability for certain strategies and tax leaks for US ETFs.
Number of ETFsUsually involves at least three funds, but multifactor funds can make implementation simpler.
Examples of FundsMulti-factor ETFs, Leveraged Portfolios, Risk-Parity ETFs, Small Cap Value, CTAs etc.
Bankeronwheels.com ResourcesCurrently, only a few guides target bankers. This will increase over time.
What Guides Are Available?
Discover the three main sections
Our guides are divided into three sections:
📚Beginners’ Guides
All Investors
These resources are compiled to introduce beginners to investing, including books and movies. Most of these resources are agnostic to your location and can be read by US, European or any other investors.
These guides focus predominately on UCITS ETFs covering Equities, Fixed Income, Fund of Funds, Alternatives and Sustainable Investing. These guides are mainly for non-US Investors.
These guides cover portfolio construction, asset allocation, asset classes or risk management. Most of these resources are agnostic to your location and can be read by US, European or any other investors.
Current Complexity of our Community Members’ Portfolios
0%Golden RetrieversAbout a third of our readers want to keep it extremely simple and efficient by using 1 to 2 ETFs for their entire portfolio.
0%Cyclists58% of our readers are passive but are experimenting with tweaking their portfolio, including tax optimisation and customisation or sometimes a few active bets.
0%Bankers12% of our readers are experienced enough to implement factor investing.
Millions of Europeans Locked Out Of ETFs. Surely, You Must be KIDing?
How a Three-Page Document Locks Millions of Europeans Out of Mainstream ETFs
Last week, I had a coaching session with a High Net Worth client from Athens. He is fluent in English, works in Big Tech, holds a postgraduate degree, and has been investing for a number of years. He wanted to open a broker account with SAXO – a Tier 1 Broker to diversify his Interactive Brokers counterparty risk and buy VWCE – the Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF that sits at the core of most European passive portfolios.
He could not.
The broker didn’t allow it. The reason is that no Greek-language Key Information Document (known as ‘KID’) exists for VWCE. The broker strictly interprets the regulation requiring a KID in the official language of the investor’s country. Since Vanguard does not publish a Greek KID, the trade is blocked. Not because the product is unsuitable, or because the investor cannot understand it.
But because a three-page disclosure document has not been translated.
It sounds like an easy fix. Why didn’t the issuer bother translating a three-page document? But if it were that simple, it would already be fixed. The real barrier is a chain of three independent failures. And it doesn’t just affect small countries. Yes, investors in smaller countries – Greece or the Czech Republic – cannot access mainstream ETFs, like those from Vanguard. But investors in large countries – France, Italy or Poland – may also not be able to buy niche ETFs, like those from Avantis.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Investors in a dozen EU countries are blocked from buying mainstream ETFs from Vanguard. The barrier is a chain of 3 independent failures: Vanguard never registered the fund, the national regulator requires a local-language KID, and the broker enforces that strictly.
But, the same investor, buying the same ETF, on the same exchange, gets a different outcome depending on which broker they use. Interactive Brokers and Swissquote let a Greek investor buy VWCE. Saxo and DEGIRO block it. Brokers have different setups and attitudes towards litigation risk.
Workarounds may exist. Consent-based brokers (IBKR, Swissquote, or Lightyear) use English-language consent clauses. For investors with portfolios above EUR 500k (dropping to EUR 250k once the EU Retail Investment Strategy enters force), MiFID II elective professional opt-up removes you from PRIIPs entirely, provided you meet additional conditions. Others like SAXO have a wide enough substitute list to construct a diversified equity portfolio, even without Vanguard.
The same rule prohibits bigger countries like Italy, France or Poland from buying Avantis ETFs. Brokers may also block investors from bigger countries like Italy or Poland investing in more niche ETFs like those from Avantis, until the issuer registers those locally.
Interestingly, the same Greek investor could open an account at Interactive Brokers and buy the same VWCE on the same exchange, at the same price, within minutes. Or he could use Swissquote. Same investor. Same ETF. Same regulation. The only thing that changes is the broker’s interpretation of a single article in a regulation.
The problem started in 2023, when PRIIPS rules were implemented for ETFs. Unfortunately, this is not a Greek problem, and it is far worse than most investors realise.
WHY INVESTORS IN SMALLER COUNTRIES CAN'T ACCESS VANGUARD ETFs
Problem #1 - The ETF issuer didn't register the ETF
there are 15 countries where VWCE is not registered
Where VWCE is registered
Where Is Your Vanguard ETF Registered?
Retail & Institutional
Institutional Only
Not Registered
Source: Vanguard, Banker on Wheels
Before a KID can be translated, the ETF must be registered for distribution in the country. This is a separate step called passporting.
The ETF issuer submits a notification file to its home regulator – typically the Central Bank of Ireland – which transmits it to the host country’s National Competent Authority (‘NCA’). The host NCA charges registration fees, and the issuer must appoint a local facilities agent, translate the KID and key legal documents, and maintain all of this on an ongoing basis, re-translating the KID every time performance scenarios or risk indicators change. For a single country, the annual cost across a full ETF range may run to tens of thousands Euros.
For VWCE, Vanguard has simply never passported into 15 EEA countries, including Greece, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Croatia, Slovenia, Slovakia, and the Baltics. There is no Greek KID for VWCE because Vanguard never submitted the paperwork.
The commercial logic is straightforward. The expected AUM inflow – particularly from financial advisors as registration means the ETFs can be marketed through them – does not justify the cost and hassle.
But why do countries differ in application?
Can you do anything about it? Sometimes. It’s the ETF issuer business logic, although some issuers may be more keen to register the ETF in your country than others. If there is enough demand they may follow the process. For mainstream ETFs, you can try to find equivalent ETFs from issuers that have registered the ETF in your country (e.g. iShares instead of Vanguard)
Problem #2 - INVESTOR'S COUNTRY DOESN'T ALLOW a KID in ENGLISH
Out of those 15 countries, investors in 7 may still be able to buy VWCE
REGULATORY BARRIER
The PRIIPs KID Language Wall
All 30BlockedNo BarrierNO VWCE Reg. ✗
22No barrier
8Blocked
Scroll right to see all columns →
Country ▲
VWCE REg.▲
KID Language Required ▲
NCA Position ▲
Barrier▲
Source: NCAs, ESA, EIOPA, Vanguard, Banker on Wheels
'+
'
'+vIcon+'
'+
'
'+r.lang+'
'+
'
'+ncaText+'
'+
'
'+badgeText+'
';
body.appendChild(tr);
});
}
var sorted=D.slice().sort(function(a,b){return a.c.localeCompare(b.c)});
render(sorted);
document.querySelectorAll('.kid-pill').forEach(function(pill){
pill.addEventListener('click',function(){
document.querySelectorAll('.kid-pill').forEach(function(p){p.classList.remove('kid-active')});
this.classList.add('kid-active');
var f=this.getAttribute('data-filter');
body.querySelectorAll('.kid-row').forEach(function(row){
var s=row.getAttribute('data-status');
var v=row.getAttribute('data-vwce');
var show=f==='all'||(f==='red'&&s==='red')||(f==='green'&&s==='green')||(f==='vwce-n'&&v==='n');
row.classList.toggle('kid-hidden',!show);
});
updateCounts();
});
});
function updateCounts(){
var g=0,r=0;
body.querySelectorAll('.kid-row:not(.kid-hidden)').forEach(function(row){
var s=row.getAttribute('data-status');
if(s==='green')g++;else r++;
});
document.getElementById('kidCountG').textContent=g;
document.getElementById('kidCountR').textContent=r;
}
document.querySelectorAll('.kid-tbl th').forEach(function(th){
th.addEventListener('click',function(){
var col=this.getAttribute('data-col');
var asc=!this.classList.contains('kid-asc');
document.querySelectorAll('.kid-tbl th').forEach(function(h){h.classList.remove('kid-sorted','kid-asc','kid-desc')});
this.classList.add('kid-sorted',asc?'kid-asc':'kid-desc');
this.querySelector('.kid-sa').innerHTML=asc?'▲':'▼';
var s=D.slice();
if(col==='country') s.sort(function(a,b){return asc?a.c.localeCompare(b.c):b.c.localeCompare(a.c)});
else if(col==='vwce') s.sort(function(a,b){return asc?VO[a.vwce]-VO[b.vwce]:VO[b.vwce]-VO[a.vwce]});
else if(col==='status') s.sort(function(a,b){return asc?SO[a.status]-SO[b.status]:SO[b.status]-SO[a.status]});
else if(col==='nca'){var o={strict:0,cond:1,open:2};s.sort(function(a,b){return asc?o[a.ncaT]-o[b.ncaT]:o[b.ncaT]-o[a.ncaT]})}
else if(col==='lang') s.sort(function(a,b){return asc?a.lang.localeCompare(b.lang):b.lang.localeCompare(a.lang)});
render(s);
});
});
// Fade overlay: hide when scrolled to end
if(window.innerWidth<=640){
var wrap=document.querySelector('.kid-tbl-wrap');
var fade=wrap.querySelector('.kid-fade');
wrap.addEventListener('scroll',function(){
fade.style.opacity=wrap.scrollLeft+wrap.clientWidth>=wrap.scrollWidth-4?'0':'1';
});
}
})();
investors can trade if A country is strategic or has ties to one of the most spoken languages
What are the rules of the game?
The EU regulation, which is not a directive – so EU states cannot implement it the way they want -is strict:
“The key information document shall be written in the official languages, or in one of the official languages, used in the part of the Member State where the PRIIP is distributed, or in another language accepted by the competent authorities of that Member State, or where it has been written in a different language, it shall be translated into one of these languages.”
In practice, this means:
Countries like Germany– NCA wants KIDs only in German (see Strict in the NCA column above). The position is strict. But, in practice the country is very strategic to Vanguard and all ETFs get translated, so there is no barrier.
Countries like Poland or Portugal – NCAs are more flexible, as long as clients sign off a declaration that they can understand English. In practice, Vanguard registered there, but even if it didn’t a broker could still make you declare you understand english and that would do the trick.
But, what about those countries where Vanguard didn’t register the ETF share class you want to buy?
Investors may still be able to buy:
Cyprus&Malta – thanks to British heritage, the local NCA approved English.
Countries like Belgium – it turns out the distributing share class is registered so the accumulating class in the table above may de facto qualify as well. If it wasn’t registered at all, the NCA flexibility would still help. Amundi’s equivalent Prime All Country World UCITS ETF (WEBN) is not registered in Belgium, but the local NCA accepts other languages. Amundi already translates KIDs into French and German for neighbouring markets, so the requirement is met without additional effort (and paradoxically non-registration may even mean better TOB tax treatment for Belgian investors).
8 out of 15 countries are too rigid and not strategic enough
We saw that Vanguard also didn’t register VWCE in Iceland, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Greece, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, or Slovenia.
They fall into two camps:
Not Strategic & Flexible Countries – like Estonia, Iceland or the Czech Republic.NCAs approve KIDs in English on the condition that the broker checks that you understand it. Your local authorities did the right thing giving you flexibility.
Not Strategic & Inflexible Countries – like Greece, Bulgaria or Slovakia. NCA wants KIDs in local language only, so investors are in a limbo. Local authorities didn’t give you flexibility.
But, that’s all theoretical limitations. How does it work in practice with brokers? Do they treat the strategic & flexible camp differently to the not strategic & inflexible?
Can you do anything about it? In theory, yes. You may try to pressure local authorities. EIOPA says it is up to each country. Some countries have acted to give investors optionality. Others have not. But, in practice things are more complicated, as we will see shortly.
Problem #3 - BROKERS HAVE DIFFERENT setups & RISK ATTITUDES
illustrative examples
3 categories of brokers (+ Professional opt-in)
How Brokers Handle the KID Language Rule
✓
Blanket English Communication ConsentENGLISH KIDs ACCEPTED
General English communication consent at account opening is treated as satisfying Article 7.
"Where possible we will provide you with a UCITS KIID or PRIIPs KID in your preferred language, but where this is unavailable the KID may only be made available in a different language. If you proceed to place your order you will be deemed to have understood and accepted the details in the KID." — Swissquote Bank Europe SA, Securities T&Cs
"You declare that you accept and understand that the official language of Lightyear is English. Lightyear will make available information and all documents, including the Lightyear mobile and web application (the “App”) and the Services, the website, key information documents, and customer communications including marketing materials available to you in English. " — Lightyear Terms of Service
English terms and stance is implict in the TWS message for ETFs that are not tradable which reads "This product requires a KID in English or in a language approved for your country. Retail clients can trade packaged retail products only if an appropriate KID is available" - Interactive Brokers (for which EU clients are consolidated into Irish entity under Central Bank of Ireland supervision)
Interactive Brokers
Swissquote LUXEMBOURG ENTITY
Lightyear
✓
Bilingual Consent ModelENGLISH KIDs ACCEPTED
Customer agreement published bilingually (e.g. Greek/English) - language question is omitted.
"In addition, the Customer can retrieve the
legally required key information documents for
so-called packaged investment products via the
Application or have them sent to the Customer
by email or post. (...) Notwithstanding the appropriateness tests,
Trade Republic recommends that Customers
obtain an overview of the respective risks of the
contemplated Securities or Crypto-Asset
transaction by means of the Help Center, key
information documents and information sheets
provided and, if applicable, by means of further
information on the part of the issuer (e.g.
securities prospectus) or from third parties (e.g.
publications in the trading-related press).
Trade Republic
✕
Strict EnforcementETF NOT AVAILABLE
If no KID exists in the required language, the order is rejected at entry. No consent workaround offered to retail clients.
Unfortunately, simply having a KID (Key Information Document) in a language you understand is not enough to allow us to offer the ETF or investment fund. Each product must be officially authorized to be offered in your country (known as ‘passporting’) and have a KID available in your local language. Of course, we cannot speak for other brokers. How they interpret the rules is up to them. However, for us, the regulations are unambiguous, and we adhere to them as closely as possible. — DEGIRO Help Centre
Before an instrument becomes available for trading, the instrument provider must ensure that it complies with regulatory requirements in each country where it intends to distribute the fund. This involves obtaining necessary approvals and meeting local regulations. If the instrument is not distributable in your country, Saxo cannot make it available for trading.
A common reason is related to the languages version permitted in your country of residence. The EU requires the provider of the instrument to have the KID translated to local languages. — SAXO Help Pages
Saxo Bank
DEGIRO
⚠
MiFID II Professional Opt-UpPRIIPS EXEMPT
Reclassification as a professional investor removes the client from PRIIPs entirely. The only fully regulator-approved solution. Currently requires 2 of 3: portfolio over EUR 500k, 10 significant trades/quarter, or 1 year in finance. The EU Retail Investment Strategy will lower the portfolio threshold to EUR 250k (3-year average).
Interactive Brokers
Swissquote
Saxo Bank
Source: Broker customer agreements, Banker on Wheels
We examined the customer agreements of few illustrative European brokers to understand how they handle the regulation. The approaches fall into three camps, and the differences are not about regulation. They are about setups and risk appetite – some read it conservatively and block trades, others engineer contractual workarounds that give investors access to the full ETF universe:
Dealing with you only in English (Interactive Brokers, Swissquote or Lightyear) – brokers may treat a blanket English communication consent as satisfying the language requirement for investors in some countries. Swissquote Luxembourg goes further with a KID-specific clause: if the KID is not available in your language and you proceed to trade, you are “deemed to have understood and accepted” it.
Dealing with you in your language and in English (e.g. Trade Republic) – some publish bilingual customer agreements and may (or not) include some language about KIDs. For Trade Republic we haven’t found any reference to KIDs language in the English+Greek double-language version.
Taking a conservative stance (SAXO or DEGIRO) – some enforce the rule very strictly. For DEGIRO, no registration in your country – no trade. It’s not even a matter of KID language. SAXO also mentions the KID translation hurdle in its help pages. Why are some brokers not making a distinction between non strategic flexible and inflexible countries? Perhaps because if they let a Czech investor buy VWCE with an English KID and that investor later loses money, the investor could argue they did not truly understand the risks because the KID was not in their language. The broker is then in a position where they have to defend the adequacy of their language check.
What are the solutions?
In practice, there are alternative ETFs. Czech investors may use e.g. Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF (see all registered countries) or Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (countries). Greek investors may use iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF (countries), or Invesco MSCI World UCITS ETF (countries).
A fourth path exists: MiFID II professional opt-up removes you from PRIIPs entirely. That is the only route that is unambiguously regulator-approved. In this case SAXO will allow an investor to tradeany ETF. By mid-2027, the €500k portfolio requirement to become an elective professional client drops to €250k.
Can you do anything about it? Yes and No. You cannot pressure brokers. Brokers have their own risk and business logic. There may have different setups too. But, you can look for brokers that are more flexible.
WHY INVESTORS IN BIG COUNTRIES CAN'T ACCESS NICHE ETFs
ITALIAN, FRENCH OR POLISH INVESTORS MAY NOT BE ABLE TO BUY AVANTIS ETFs
If you followed me until now, you should also understand why a lot of brokers may block investors in bigger countries buying niche ETFs like the Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF (‘AVWS’).
AVWS is currently only registered in Switzerland, Germany, Austria, the UK, Denmark, Ireland and the Netherlands.
All other investors are locked out, unless they use e.g. Interactive Brokers.
The same logic applies. Italy accepts only Italian KIDs and until the ETF is registered in Italy brokers may not give access to it. Some brokers may also block e.g. Polish investors to avoid potential litigation risk, even if English is conditionally allowed.
Finally, even if the KID is translated, the ETF may not be automatically available with the broker. For niche ETFs, you may need to request it. Brokers can also be incentivised by ETF providers to promote certain brands more than others. They are the gatekeepers.
“
We must take a new stance towards cooperation: in removing obstacles, harmonising rules and laws, and coordinating policies. There are different constellations in which we can move forward. But what we cannot do is fail to move forward at all.
Mario Draghi—The Future of European Competitiveness Report
What's NEXT?
Our Greek coaching client could use his existing Interactive Brokers account. He could buy VWCE on the same exchange, at the same price, that Saxo blocked him from accessing. But he is likely to prefer a quasi equivalent iShares ETF to diversify away his broker counterparty risk. Here is why he thinks it may be worth it.
Other investors can mix brokers and issuers. Buy Avantis with Interactive Brokers. Use iShares Core MSCI World instead of Vanguard with SAXO. Those with portfolios above €500k (dropping to €250k by mid-2027) can opt up to MiFID II professional status and sidestep PRIIPs entirely.
These are workarounds. They should not be necessary.
A regulation designed to protect retail investors is, in practice, locking millions of them out of building blocks of a diversified portfolio.
Reducing ETF registration cost and burden could help. NCA flexibility especially for very small countries, could also help, but may not be enough for risk-averse brokers.
The real fix is at EU level. Let investors sign off on understanding the risks in any language they understand, as long as a KID is available.
What happens if I spend 10 years in the UK, then move to Greece. I can no longer trade because I may not understand English? We live on a continent where people move across borders, speak multiple languages, and use AI to translate a three-page document in seconds. As Draghi put it, “what we cannot do is fail to move forward.”
This seems like an easy place to start.
What else should you consider?
In the upcoming guide, we will look at broker tax reporting. Which ones gives you hassle-free tax submissions?
Thank you for reading. Good Luck and Keep’em* Rolling!
Updated MethodologyThis is our updated broker review methodology. New broker review layouts reflecting these changes are currently rolled out.
Introduction
When choosing a broker, investors face a myriad of considerations, from safety measures to fee structures and beyond. Bankeronwheels.com takes a unique approach to broker comparison, designed with the discerning investor in mind. Here’s how we guide you through making an informed decision:
🎯We Focus On Wise Investors
We assess brokers based on typical requirements of our readers, that prioritise long-term compounding, safety and low fees. We penalise brokers that have riskier business models, not enough capital or/and focus on niches such as overpriced speculative instruments.
Investors may have different priorities given the size of their portfolios and overall goals. For beginners, a low-cost Tier 2 broker may be appealing, while an investor with significant assets may prioritise safety and a broker within a banking group or Tier 1 category.
We offer safety considerations to help users make informed decisions. But, we have no safety sub-score. The omission of safety scores is deliberate, as assessing the safety of a broker involves a complex array of factors – often requiring access to private information – including financials and operational data. Instead, our goal is to highlight some safety and transparency considerations that typically go into Probability of Default / Loss Given Default estimations.
🏛️0+Brokers ReviewedWe are working on adding more each week.
🏆0 + 0Scores & SubscoresSo you can match brokers to your needs. A granularity that increases transparency.
🔢0TiersBroker Categorisation designed in-house by Raph. Because brokers play in different leagues and target different investors.
🔎0Evaluation CriteriaIncluding Company deep dives, legal documentation reviews, fee simulations and platform testing.
👤0+ContributorsFollowing the methodology & Overseen by Raph with decades of Portfolio Management Experience at Wall Street’s Top Asset Management Firm
Key Takeaways
Our Two Assessments
Each broker is given two assessments – An absolute score and a relative score called Category Ranking:
1. Absolute Score has three components:
Company sub-score – evaluates brokers based on objective inputs into typical likelihood of survival assessment, transparency, and business risks, focusing on factors like banking affiliation, transparency measures, risk mitigators, and the nature of their product and service offerings, without providing specific safety scores.
Fee sub-score – We assess the impact of recurrent fees, such as custody and inactivity fees, on long-term compounding, differentiating between one-off and ongoing charges.
Platform sub-score – Key considerations for all investors include easy share transfers, availability of UCITS ETFs or automated investing, alongside specialised needs such as U.S. ETF, mutual fund and bond access or derivatives markets.
2. Category Ranking – is a relative rating comparing each broker within their own category. The ranking components have the same inputs as the Absolute score, but the weights change. For example, investors choosing Tier 2 Brokers typically invests smaller amounts and prioritise fees and platform/tax handling over company track record as they are fully covered by National Investment Protection Schemes.
Additional Country-Specific Considerations
Separately each review has a section at the bottom related to local considerations. Presence of tax wrappers for European countries, tax reporting features, standard tax reporting for compliance and ease of tax filings for all investors, as well as customised reports adapted to country-specific tax laws.
Scoring Process
Our review process combines quantitative data analysis with qualitative expert assessment across four stages:
1🔍We Collect Data
Initially, we aggregate all publicly accessible data, sourced directly from brokers as well as a diverse array of third-party entities. To meticulously monitor the evolution of broker documentation and various other inputs over time, we maintain comprehensive archives of data snapshots.
2📝We Send Questionnaires
In instances where public data proves insufficient, we proactively seek additional information by distributing detailed questionnaires to relevant entities.
3📞We Conduct Calls
Extending from operational staff to the upper echelons of broker management. These interactions are key in bridging informational gaps, ensuring a holistic understanding of each broker’s operations. If questionnaires and/or calls are not sufficient to address our key concerns, we will assume the worst case as scoring input.
4⚖We Benchmark And Score Brokers
Leveraging our proprietary evaluation framework, we assign scores to brokers, which are then benchmark against peers. This process is overlaid by our expert analysis, ensuring that our assessments are both comprehensive and insightful.
Weight Of Areas In The Methodology
This graph shows you the importance of each subscore to our absolute Broker score. For example, 35% of the total score depends on Company (including Safety Considerations or Transparency). We may overlay it with a qualitative input based on our expert assessment. But, we also provide the subscores, so you can assess based on your own preferrences for certain areas.
Tax wrappers and country-considerations are included separately at the end of the broker review page.
Why fixed weights? The Absolute Score uses the same 35/35/30 weights for every broker, providing a universal benchmark regardless of tier.
Category Ranking
All scores — both overall and subscores — are expressed on a 0–5 scale divided into four quality bands. The scale below shows the score-to-label mapping:
02.53.54.55
Lagger
Fair
Good
Excellent
Score Range
Label
Interpretation
4.5 – 5.0
Excellent
Top-tier in this category; among the very best available
3.5 – 4.4
Good
Above average; solid choice for most investors
2.5 – 3.4
Fair
Acceptable but with notable drawbacks
0.0 – 2.4
Lagger
Below average; significant weaknesses in this area
Company Subscore
Likelihood of survival, Transparency And Business Risks
We will not assess the broker’s probability of default or provide safety scores. However, we may rely on external metrics like ratings – if available – to estimate the implied risks, based on historical default for similar cohorts. We will also provide safety considerations, that may to some extent play a role in assessing the risks, including but not limited to:
Banking Affiliation: Affiliation with a systemic banking group provides benefits such as implied investment grade ratings, greater oversight, revenue diversification, and potentially increased protection.
Transparency: Credit Ratings, Exchange Listing or Public Accounts increase transparency.
Risk Mitigators: Higher Risk-Adjusted Capital, tighter regulations for banking entities, or profitability potentially decrease risks.
Product and Service Offerings: Offering leveraged products may introduce additional business risks, while additional guarantees could provide increased protection.
Evaluation Criteria
Years In BusinessVery High
Systemic Banking GroupVery High
Mandatory Securities Lending PenaltyVery High
Any Banking GroupHigh
Bank Licence(s)High
Debt RatingHigh
Exchange ListingHigh
Detailed Public AccountsHigh
ProfitabilityHigh
Market CapitalisationHigh
Tier 1 CapitalHigh
Experience of RegulatorsHigh
ReputationHigh
History of FinesHigh
Additional GuaranteesMedium
Leveraged ProductsMedium
Note: The Company subscore is a qualitative expert assessment. There is no automated formula — the analyst considers all 16 criteria holistically and assigns a score from 0.0 to 5.0 based on peer comparison.
Fee Subscore
European and UK Brokers tend to have complex fee structures, making them hard to compare. However, most of our readers have simple portfolios and typically buy & hold, which makes it possible to run illustrative scenarios and compare the overall cost in a savings phase of your life (prior retirement).
The Fee subscore quantifies the total cost of ownership over a 10-year period for a standardised investment scenario. Unlike the Company subscore, Fees are scored using a precise, formula-driven methodology.
Model Assumptions
€100,000Initial Investment
€1,000/moMonthly Contribution
7%Annual Return
10 yearsInvestment Horizon
The fee model accounts for all recurring costs that erode portfolio value over time:
Fee Type
Description
Custody Fees
Annual charge for holding your assets (% of portfolio or flat fee, may be tiered)
Inactivity Fees
Charges for accounts with no trading activity over a period
Trading Commissions
Per-trade costs for buying/selling ETFs (flat, %, or tiered, with minimums)
FX Conversion Fees
Currency exchange costs when trading non-native-currency ETFs
Connectivity Fees
Exchange access charges for foreign market connections
Proprietary Fee Scoring
The fee score is determined using our proprietary formula that considers the total 10-year cost, FX conversion fees, and structural penalties. The model assigns a base score based on overall cost competitiveness, applies notch adjustments for FX fees (which compound significantly over time and disproportionately affect cross-border investors).
The final fee score is clamped between 0.0 and 5.0.
Note: Our calculator assesses visible commissions and fees. However, post PFOF ban in June 2026, and with the advent of Systemic Internalisers – often in the form of Single Market Maker (SMM) Exchanges – Neobrokers have shifted towards an SMM model where most costs are opaque and in the form of spreads. In this case we apply negative notching for lack of transparency, including (i) the presence of only one SMM exchange or equivalent setup – the worst setup, (ii) the presence of only one non-SMM exchange – somewhat mitigated by giving the investor the choice of a Lit Exchange, and (iii) only indirect access to exchanges through third-party brokers – mitigated by the broker operating no SMM and having no less conflict of interest as it chooses the best partner based on execution quality. See below.
Transparency Notching: Best to Worst
The base Fee Score reflects our proprietary 10-year cost and FX model. We then apply negative notching according to how transparent a broker’s exchange access is – from no penalty (multiple Lit Exchanges) through to the maximum penalty (a single Single Market Maker exchange):
◀ Best · least notchingMost notching · Worst ▶
No notch
Low
Moderate
Maximum
No notchMultiple Lit ExchangesFull price transparency and genuine venue choice
LowIndirect / third-party accessBroker operates no SMM and routes to the best partner on execution quality
ModerateSingle Lit ExchangeOnly one non-SMM exchange offered as an alternative, but the broker incentivises investors to trade through their SMM
MaximumSingle SMM (or equivalent)Costs hidden in spreads – maximum lack of transparency. No alternatives. All orders carry a conflict of interest.
The Platform subscore quantifies features and usability using our proprietary scoring model across 18 attributes. Each feature contributes positively or negatively based on its importance to long-term investors, and the total is clamped to a 0–5 range.
We evaluate four dimensions:
Common Features — Exchange access, recurring investing, multicurrency accounts, bonds etc.
Automation & Convenience — Savings plans, mobile app quality, ease of use, family accounts.
Specialised Needs — Elective Professional Investor Status, margin, separate custody, security lending etc.
Penalties — Single Market Maker Exchange Brokers (or de facto such), mandatory security lending or no share transfer.
Evaluation Criteria
Recurring InvestingVery High
Great Ease of UseVery High
Only 1 SMM/SI Exchange PenaltyVery High
No Share Transfer PenaltyVery High
Mandatory Security Lending PenaltyVery High
Family SubaccountsHigh
Elective Professional StatusHigh
Great Mobile AppHigh
Only 1 non-SMM/SI Exchange PenaltyHigh
5+ ExchangesMedium
Security Lending RevenuesMedium
Multicurrency AccountHigh
BondsMedium
International BrokerMedium
Margin LoansLow
DerivativesLow
High Cash InterestLow
Separate CustodyLow
Platform Score = max(0, min(5, Σ Feature Points))
Note: The exact point values for each feature are part of our proprietary scoring model. The impact levels above indicate relative importance to the overall platform score.
Investor-Specific Suitability
What are the investor-specific considerations?
You can find those at the top of the review page.
We assess broker suitability based on the three typical investor profiles. For example, Bond Market or Mutual Fund Access could be important for Cyclists that want a more customised portfolio. For Bankers, US ETF access, Margin loans and derivatives could be beneficial to construct risk parity portfolios or access factor ETFs not available in the UCITS format.
⚠️ Suitability not only depends on the portfolio complexity, but also on the investment amount. Given the low Investor Compensation Scheme thresholds in Europe, we emphasize Broker Diversification.
Example: How It Looks on a Review Page
▶ Suitability
Passive
Usually SuitableCheap, automated but Complex
🤔
Semi-Active
SuitableFamily subaccounts, Automated Investing
😊
Active
Very SuitableMargin loans, Access to US Markets, Derivatives
Tax treatment varies significantly by jurisdiction and can materially affect net returns. We address country-specific factors separately from the universal score:
📋 Standard Tax Reporting
Does the broker provide tax reports compatible with your country’s requirements? Automated tax certificates reduce compliance burden significantly.
📑 Custom Tax Reporting
Some jurisdictions require specific formats (e.g., German Vorabpauschale, Austrian Meldefonds). We note which brokers support these natively.
🏦 Tax Wrappers
Country-specific tax-advantaged accounts like UK ISAs and SIPPs, French PEA, or Swiss Pillar 3a. Availability of these wrappers can dramatically change the effective cost of investing.
Expert Overlay & Adjustments
After the quantitative scores are computed, our editorial team may apply a small manual adjustment to either the Absolute Score or the Category Ranking to capture factors that the formula cannot fully reflect.
✎
Adjustments are incremental
Applied in 0.1 increments. Adjustments rarely exceed ±0.3.
📝
Every adjustment requires a justification
The reason is recorded internally for audit and transparency. Examples: exceptional customer service, recent regulatory action, unique product innovation.
🔒
Final score is always clamped
Final Score = max(0, min(5, Computed Score + Adjustment))
Why allow adjustments? No formula can capture every nuance. A broker might have an extraordinary customer service reputation, a recent scandal, or a unique feature that our 17 Company criteria and 19 Platform features cannot fully quantify. The adjustment mechanism ensures our scores remain holistic and fair.
Frequently Asked Questions
They are two different metrics. They use the same exact inputs. The only difference is the weight we assign to the sub-scores:
The Broker Score is an absolute score. With this score you can compare any broker across all categories. The criteria and weights are the same whether the broker is backed by a Bank, an independent Tier 1 or Tier 2 broker.
The Category Rank is a relative score. The idea is to compare ‘comparable’ brokers. For example, Interactive Brokers plays in a different league than Lightyear. Read here how we think about broker categories. Each category has a different weight of company, fee and platform subscore.
We have two assessments (but we only call one a ‘Score’), because investors needs are often very different. The inputs for both the Broker Score and the Category Ranking are the same, but the weights change. For example, investors choosing Tier 2 Brokers typically invest smaller amounts and prioritise fees and platform/tax handling over company track record as they are fully covered by National Investment Protection Schemes.
Investors with large portfolios typically exceed the Investment Protection Schemes and put a lot of emphasis on the long-term viability of the broker’s business and its track record. That’s why our absolute Broker Score includes a 35% weight to the ‘Company’.
New investors with smaller portfolios often choose fully-digital brokers and prioritise costs and platform functionality over company track record, as most of these brokers are start ups. National Protection Schemes often protect investors with small amounts, so bankruptcy is less of a risk, but cost reduction in an early phase is especially important due to compounding. In that case investors may look at relative category rankings. Investors may ultimately consider a transfer to a Tier 1 Broker once the account grows larger, for example to reduce counterparty risk if the broker remains unprofitable over the years. In our relative rankings, we heavily penalise brokers that don’t allow share transfers.
Tier 1 category ranking weights – are 35% / 35% / 30% for Company, Fees and Platform. Tier 2 category ranking weights – are 15% / 50% / 35% for Company, Fees and Platform. Banking Brokers category ranking weights – are 15% / 50% / 35% for Company, Fees and Platform.
No one can. We provide a company subscore to help users make informed decisions. Assessing the safety of a broker involves a complex array of factors – often requiring access to private information – including financials and operational data. But in our reviews we research relevant inputs that may play a role in the safety, so you can reduce risks based on those considerations. We also include information that is relevant based on our due diligence calls with brokers.
There are five categories:
1. Direct Brokers (backed by Banks) 2. Traditional Brokerage Arms of Banks 3. Tier 1 Brokers (non-Bank) 4. Tier 2 Brokers (non-Bank) 5. Tier 3 Brokers (non-Bank)
We deliberately decrease the importance of certain aspects that are less relevant to the success of investors, such as availability of stock research or/and videos / educational materials. This is because (i) Brokers should focus on their job and do it well and (ii) Brokers very often don’t educate well given their incentives for you to trade often and obvious conflicts of interest. Promotion of certain markets that harm investors (e.g. CFDs) is also not an advantage.
2025 Year-End Survey: Shape The Future Of Banker on Wheels!
This year's survey is very different
Banker on Wheels started as a simple investing blog in early 2020.
Since then, what’s grown around it has mattered even more than the guides: a community of international and wise investors who care about doing things properly.
As we head into 2026, we want to make Banker on Wheels more useful, more personal, and more community-driven – and that starts with listening.
The quick survey this year is different. It’s much more outcome oriented and you will shape what we build next:
Our Free Guides – Make our 2026 Guides more useful to you 🎯
Weekend Reading – What you want more of and its format🗞️
Premium Research – Choose what will be released & learn how we want to do it 🔍
Future Rollers Community – What would make you show up (forum, Q&As, meetups)?
Your feedback directly influences our roadmap – what we publish, and how we prioritise improvements.
✅ It’s anonymous ✅ Takes 5 minutes, but you can skip questions if not relevant ✅ It’s BoW style – no fluff
🎁 Win a Year of FREE Premium Research!
OPTIONAL BONUS: The survey is anonymous, but if you would like to be included in the draw for a year of Premium Research (and be among the first ones to use it) you can also leave an email at the end.
We may be a small website, but we’re proud to have an incredible, high-quality community of passionate investors like you. Together, we can make wise investing a bigger movement – your support means the world to us, whether financial or non-financial. Would you like to contribute to the website?
Did we make a tiny difference in your life? Keep Us Fueled! ☕😊 If we’ve made a difference for you this year, consider supporting us here with the cost of a small coffee. Every contribution, no matter how small, helps us stay motivated and continue delivering value to you. Your kind words and symbolic gestures truly brighten our day! ❤️
Wear the Movement 🚴♂️👕 If you’d rather support us in a visible way, our merch helps spread the message beyond the website – and it also supports the work behind the scenes. Every item is a small badge for the community. Shop here.
Our Unmissable TOP 10 in 2025 – Did You Catch Them All?
As we prepare our pipeline of articles and ideas for 2026 it’s time to summarise what you liked in the prior 12 months.
Here are some of our TOP 10 most-read posts of the past 12 months.
Filter:
2025 Most Popular Articles
1
ETFs
VWCE & Chill: Beyond the 3 Bps TER Drop – Cuts Matter due to Vanguard’s European Ownership Structure.
A couple of months ago, I spoke with Vanguard’s European management to convey that our community expects action, and that our rankings reflect the latest fee dynamics. The call was encouraging, but—given the group’s U.S.–centric decision making and the lack of meaningful cuts in recent years—I remained cautious on near-term reductions.
As I released my analysis, Vanguard dropped its fees!
In this article we look at Vanguard’s updated positioning in Europe as it relates to its flagship ETF.
Avoiding the Value Trap – A Review of Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETF
Over the past few years, a growing community of data-driven investors has embraced factor investing. The allure is clear: a more rigorous, empirical approach underpinned by Nobel Prize–winning research —a perfect match for financial advisors, STEM graduates, and analytical minds alike.
While factor strategies have long been a staple in institutional portfolios, they are now gaining traction in the individual investor space, thanks in part to better financial education and the rise of ETFs. In this article, we review one of the most interesting ETFs recently launched in UCITS format – the Avantis Global Small Cap Value UCITS ETFs.
Let’s dive in.
For a Decade the Only Game in Town: A Review of SPDR MSCI Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETFs
In order to get exposure to Small Cap Value, SPDR was the only game in town for most European individual investors for over a decade.
Today, with the launch of new products from competitors like Avantis, Robeco and Dimensional it’s worth having a look what you can achieve by tracking an MSCI Index based on a transparent yet simple methodology.
Let’s look whether you necessairly need a specialised quant research firm to gain decent multi-factor exposure at a very reasonable cost.
Trump & Beyond: How the New Landscape May Impact Your Portfolio
Fifteen years ago, as a newly minted junior portfolio manager, I sat down with a seasoned VP—now a partner at one of the largest hedge funds. He taught me that successful multi-asset portfolio management is all about identifying a few – rare in one’s career – macro shifts, and then riding them for a number of years.
We may be witnessing one of these shifts. Questions from our readers imply you, too, also intuitively sense it. For most of us, this isn’t about predicting the future—especially from a hectic newsflow that only lasted for a couple of months.
But to understand how assets may behave.
Let’s explore shifts that started over the past years, which Trump is only accelerating. What could it mean for your portfolio and what are the key guides to help enhance its resilience?
Your Battle Plan For The Next Market Chaos: Crafting a Rock-Solid IPS
History shows that reacting emotionally to market turmoil is rarely the right move.
Enter the IPS: not just paperwork, but your battle plan
Enter the Investment Policy Statement (IPS): not just paperwork, but your battle plan. It defines your goals, pins down your risk tolerance, and hands you clear rules for stormy markets—no matter how “unprecedented” they may feel. By acknowledging that market downturns and periods of uncertainty are inevitable, an IPS helps investors prepare emotionally and financially for the rough patches. By staying focused on long-term objectives and maintaining a diversified portfolio, investors can weather the storms of uncertainty and emerge stronger on the other side.
Ready to build your IPS? Here’s what to consider—and how often to revisit it. Let’s jump in.
As Bitcoin once again gains momentum, and Bitcoin ETFs break flow records given deregulation and U.S. Government’s stance on crypto it’s worth reassessing the risks worth diving into, but not the usual ones most discuss.
Yes, investors have come to expect the wild price swings—volatility is a feature, not a bug—but there’s a far more ominous risk lurking: quantum computing.
While a handful of ETF issuers – including BlackRock a few days ago – have begun to call out this threat, many of the industry’s largest institutional players remain surprisingly complacent.
In this article, Kumiko’s questions will unpack what’s truly at stake, and Ethan will walk us through some likely scenarios. Let’s dive in.
From Alaska to Japan: The Bear Market Survival Kit for Savers & Retirees 🐻
1 out of 3 bear markets is a “grizzly” — long and brutal. We haven’t seen one since 2008. Make sure you're prepared.
The Stock Market can make you rich and financially independent. But while a bear-watching trip to Alaska is optional, market crashes for long-term investors are inevitable.
Even with today’s high valuations in some sectors and countries, it’s usually wiser to stay the course and follow your strategy, than try to time the market.
But what if the next crash — or a long, grinding bear market — is just around the corner? Can you dodge it?
Here’s the catch: when you spot a grizzly bear, it’s already too late. They swim, climb, and sprint at 60 km/h. Preparation is key — just like in bear markets.
In this article, we’ll revisit history’s worst-case scenarios and the asset classes that can make your portfolio truly resilient.
With Leverage at All-Time Highs, Which Brokers Are Most Exposed to Failure?
It’s striking how many coaching sessions I held with investors who will spend considerable time improving factor tilts for a hypothetical 20 bps outperformance but often ignore the elephants in the room. A big one is parking their entire life savings – often millions – with a single broker. That creates unnecessary counterparty risk and a single point of failure in their setup.
It’s rarely discussed online because it’s a very low likelihood (but high impact) event, and most investors have little knowledge about the dynamics.
But today the stakes are higher. That’s because according to FINRA, leverage in Q3 2025 has hit an all time high.
Could your broker be next? I spent part of my career managing portfolios involving bankruptcies and distressed debt and can provide you with some aspects you should consider. In this article, let’s look at how to protect your savings.
To complement our guides, we just launched BoW's Markets Hub. This guide is a visual walkthrough of the key dashboards – what each chart shows, which toggles matter, and how to use them.
WHAT IS IT? The BoW Markets Hub is a new collection of live tools and analytics that sits alongside our long-form guides. It updates with fresh analytics every day!
WHY HAVE WE CREATED IT? The main goal is to help you monitor your portfolio, compare it to key asset classes and risk factors, rebalance with more confidence, and stay on top of major long-term market trends.
ARE THERE MORE MONITORS COMING? As of Novermber 9th we have already released 6 monitors which are described below. New monitors will be released over the coming weeks – check back periodically for fresh additions.
How To Make Difficult Life Decisions: Easy Decisions, Hard Life. Hard Decisions, Easy Life.
I sat down and made a radical decision: it was time to blow up my career.
Whenever I catch up with friends in London or Paris, many confess they feel trapped on the hamster wheel, longing to live life to the fullest.
While I’m not a life coach (Francesca’s probably the one for that!), during my financial coaching sessions some of my readers also express similar lifestyle dilemmas. Here’s how one simple exercise in 2018 changed everything for me.
My life took a dramatic turn when I applied this framework.
Here’s why this might* be exactly what you need, too.
*Not Life Advice.
🤔 Wondering why finding honest Investing Guidance is so difficult? That’s because running an independent website like ours is very hard work. If You Found Value In Our Content And Wish To Support Our Mission:
In 2019, I cycled 4,000+ km across Japan, from Hokkaido to Okinawa. A few typhoons forced me to leave, but one reason I will come back is the architecture, especially the peaceful countryside and the Japanese gardens.
Japanese people love minimalism and simplicity. In a lot of fields, as Steve Jobs said, building simple products is hard. Making a product like the iPhone certainly was.
Yet, in investing, building efficient equity portfolios is simple. Today, let’s look how to do it using just one ETF.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Do You Understand Your Strategy? If you can’t explain it to a Golden Retriever, you don’t understand it. Your complicated strategy will be tested by the market – like the value of subprime bonds was for german investors in 2008. That’s when most investors bail out.
Why A Global ETF? It is likely what a lot of experienced Wall Street professionals would choose if they had to opt for one fund to Hold On for Dear Life. Global ETFs cover all sectors and countries, follow the money, are cheap, hassle-free and unbiased.
SPDR wins again in 2026. We promoted SPDR to #1 a year ago and the last 12 months proved us right. The case is even stronger this year. On top of that, SPDR is now the cheapest Global ETF in Europe once you account for all ongoing costs, not just TER.
Amundi is now in our TOP 3. The story in Europe is different to what’s happening in the U.S. Historically, Vanguard was the cheapest and a clear leader. Today both Vanguard and iShares are expensive, and Vanguard’s recent fee cut wasn’t enough to change that. Amundi has replaced iShares as #3 in our ranking after improving replication quality. If you are looking for a non-US provider, Amundi may do the trick.
Some investors need to consider local aspects. UK Investors have also a couple of additional Mutual Funds to choose from. Swiss and Elective Professional Investors can choose even cheaper ETFs domiciled in the U.S. French investors may need to use synthetic ETFs in their PEA wrappers. Belgian investors can reduce TOB tax by choosing a EU but not Belgium-registered ETF. We summarise those at the end of the article.
What if you could only buy ONE single investment
I spent part of my career managing Asset-Backed Securities. Yes, the ones that blew up in 2008. I actually went into this field only in 2009 – to ‘clean up’ the mess.
One thing that you quickly learn when running complex, multi-layered models, is to be alarmed when investments get complicated, and if you can’t explain it to a six-year-old or a Golden Retriever.
Be alarmed if you can't explain it to a Golden Retriever
One of the biggest mistakes Investors made was taking things at face value, especially for very complex products, while being remote from the place where these products originated.
It happened, for example, when an Investor bought Assets with the highest credit rating but didn’t quite understand and didn’t have the systems to analyse.
Most of us don’t have access to sophisticated products, but a lot of traps remain. Academic research and empirical evidence point to the fact that simple Investing Strategies like Index Investing usually work best, are easily understood and accessible to anyone.
What if you could only buy into ONE single investment and HODL?
Interestingly, when you speak to people who have been in the investment business for a long time and ask them the above question, which by definition makes them think about their true beliefs and long term risks they understand and leaves short term speculation off the table, with the idea that:
They could only choose one passive investment for their personal portfolio
HODL (Hold On for Dear Life) so that they can only withdraw from it to fund their living expenses.
The answer often is... a Global Equity ETF.
Sure enough, if we assume you can’t swap investments and can only withdraw to fund your living expenses, we’re taking out the biggest investment risk out of the equation – yourself and your emotions.
And in fact, wise investors often move from complex portfolios to this simple strategy as they realise that the market almost always wins in the long run.
The Simplest Investment - A Global ETF
Do you need knowledge to invest?
You don’t need much knowledge to put your cash to work.
In fact, to get exposure to Global Equities, you only need a single ETF. And this exposure evolves with the markets as certain markets grow or decline.
Currently, c. 60% of all World Stocks as measured by market capitalization are US Equities.
But it wasn’t always that way, as you see on the animation below (use the ▶️ button).
The chart represents the % of World Stock Market Capitalization over the past 120 years.
In essence – US dominance is possible, but very unlikely to remain permanent.
Market performance as measured by size
World Equity Market Cap — A Century of Dominance
A Century of Changing Dominance
Share of World Equity Market Capitalisation, 1900–2026
1900
La Belle Époque — European capital reigns
Loading world map…
Top 8 by Share of World Market Cap1900
1900192019401960198020002026
Sources: Bankeronwheels.com calculations based on JST database, Dimson, Marsh & Staunton for historical data, and MSCI for modern era. Approximate World equity market capitalisation, year-end figures, 1900–2026. Rest of World aggregates all markets outside the named countries. Korea, Taiwan, India separately tracked from 2023 given their recent rise. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Low Returns (mainly rebalancing premium for baskets)
Bitcoin
✅ High
❌ No
🟡 Partial
❌ No
⚡⚡ Very High
FIAT currencies' confidence crisis
Very High Volatility
High Stocks Correlation
Illiquids – Real Estate / PE etc.
❌ Low
🟡 Partial
✅ Yes
🟡 Partial
⚡ High
Inflation
Illiquid
Idiosyncratic Risks
Management Hassle
Cash (ST Duration)
✅✅ Very High
✅ Yes
❌ No
❌ No
✅ Stable
Inflation Hedge
Opportunity Cost if rates drop
Medium Government Bonds
✅ High
🟡 Partial
❌ No
✅ Yes
⚡ Medium
Income Lock
Inflation sensitive
Long Duration Government Bonds
✅ High
🟡 Partial
❌ No
✅ Yes
⚡ High
Yield Pick Up
Spread Has Some Correlation with Equities
Corporate Bond ETFs
✅ High
❌ No
❌ No
✅ Yes
⚡ Medium
Higher Yield Pick Up
Higher Correlation with Stocks
Inflation Protection Bond ETFs
✅ High
✅ Yes
✅ Yes
✅ Yes
⚡ Medium
Real Rate Lock
Duration in Europe/UK
Managed Futures (Trend, Carry)
✅ High
✅ Yes
❌ No
❌ No
⚡ High
Lack of correlation to Stocks & Bonds with long downward trend protection
Complexity / Due Diligence
Standalone Volatility
Survivorship
Model Risk
Tail Risk Hedging Strategies
✅ High
✅ Yes
❌ No
❌ No
⚡⚡ Very High
Macro Shock Protection
Complexity / Due Diligence
Ongoing premium cost
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.
If a statue is ever erected to honor the person who has done the most for American investors, the hands-down choice should be Jack Bogle, the founder of Vanguard.
🤔 Wondering why finding honest Investing Guidance is so difficult? That’s because running an independent website like ours is very hard work. If You Found Value In Our Content And Wish To Support Our Mission:
Over the past year we’ve published 15 reviews of UK brokers. It’s time to pull what we’ve found together for a deep dive into the UK broker landscape. In this first article, we look at the structure of the UK retail investor world – the accounts available, the regulators, the kinds of investors involved, and the kind of products provided by brokers.
Bank brokers benefit from familiarity. The bank brands are visible, psychologically available and reassuring. You may have banked with Lloyds your whole life (I did from thirteen to my mid twenties). The big banks like Barclays, HSBC and the Lloyds Banking Group have tens of millions of customers and thousands of physical branches across the UK. You can’t walk around a town without noticing one. They’re as much a part of the furniture of the UK as Heathrow airport or Manchester United. It’s not a bold step into trusting a new institution to open your banking app and set up an investing account. But, how do fees compare?
The late 1980s through to the mid 2000s were a good time to be an investing adult in the UK. Fees were coming down, choice was going up. You no longer had to buy your shares via a man in a pinstriped suit and a top hat in an office. Economic growth and soaring asset prices meant those building their careers in this era have done well. This generation of investors do care about names. They have some loyalty to brands and prefer long-standing firms, with a good track record in terms of both reputation and profitability. They care about strong customer service as their needs and aims are more complex than slamming some cash into an ETF once a month. Let’s look at the sophistication of those platforms, their safety and fees.
Apple released the first iPhone in 2007. 17 years and 16 iPhone generations later, the generation born around the turn of the century now have jobs and money of their own. They haven’t known a world without handheld, app-based tech products. A new wave of brokers has emerged to meet the needs of this market. Let’s look how they compare.
🙋 Wondering why finding honest Investing Guidance is so difficult? That’s because running an independent website like ours is very hard work. If You Found Value In Our Content And Wish To Support Our Mission To Help Others, Consider:
FreshRSS 
